The article's title reflects the content and purpose of the article?
Yes
Was the aim of the work clearly defined and successfully accomplished?
Yes
Does the article embrace contemporary issues in the area?
Yes
Does the article contain new and not published results?
Yes
Was the article clearly written and easily understood?
Easily understood
Conclusions illustrate the research results, recommendations and giving suggestions for future research
Yes
The references are full and grounded?
Partially
How adequate was the writing and used terminology?
Adequate
Remarks and suggestions to the authors of the article
1) As authors are from same department their info-block could be combined.
2) It would be good to include author's previous work "OBTAINING OF POLYMETHACRYLATE ADDITIVES AND STUDYING OF OPERATIONAL PROPERTIES OF AN ALLOYED INDUSTRIAL OIL" in REFERENCES and show main novelty.
I confirm that there is no conflict of interests regarding reviewed article.
I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have insignificant reservations, as outlined above.