Article’s title
The article's title reflects the content and purpose of the article?
Yes
Was the aim of the work clearly defined and successfully accomplished?
Yes
Does the article embrace contemporary issues in the area?
Yes
Does the article contain new and not published results?
Yes
Was the article clearly written and easily understood?
Easily understood
Conclusions illustrate the research results, recommendations and giving suggestions for future research
Yes
The references are full and grounded?
Yes
How adequate was the writing and used terminology?
Rather adequate
Remarks and suggestions to the authors of the article
Minor English correction needed:
1. Please correct "performans" to: "performance" in the Abstract.
2. In results, below Fig 1 please correct surface "aria" to surface "area"
3. Please correct the sentence which start with "Understandable Comprehensible, ...." just below Fig 2
4. Please correct (in the same sentence): "hydrophylity to oleophylity." to "from hydrophilicity to lipophilicity"
5. Please correct: "OA has preferences in this sense" to "OA has an advantage in this regard..."
6. Please correct "chemosorption" to "chemisorption" (in sesvral places in the paper)
I confirm that there is no conflict of interests regarding reviewed article.
I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have insignificant reservations, as outlined above.
Comments
Dear Professor Tomasz Robert Sosnowski.
We are grateful to your for your thorough review of our manuscript 'Effect of the surface modification of HAp nanoparticles by oleic acid on the properties of HDPE nanocomposites containing thereof'.
The text of this manuscript has been corrected in accordance with your comments.
Very sincerely yours,
Authors