The article's title reflects the content and purpose of the article?
Yes
Was the aim of the work clearly defined and successfully accomplished?
Yes
Does the article embrace contemporary issues in the area?
Yes
Does the article contain new and not published results?
Yes
Was the article clearly written and easily understood?
Easily understood
Conclusions illustrate the research results, recommendations and giving suggestions for future research
Partially
The references are full and grounded?
Yes
How adequate was the writing and used terminology?
Adequate
Remarks and suggestions to the authors of the article
In this work, the results were obtained, which allow us to assert the prospects of using metallized polyethylene as a basis for creating heat storage systems. The charging and discharging time of the battery, in the case of using copper-filled polyethylene, is significantly shorter compared to the original polyethylene, which indicates a higher thermal conductivity of the metallized polymer system.
I confirm that there is no conflict of interests regarding reviewed article.
I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.