The article's title reflects the content and purpose of the article?
Partially
Was the aim of the work clearly defined and successfully accomplished?
Partially
Does the article embrace contemporary issues in the area?
Yes
Does the article contain new and not published results?
I do not know
Was the article clearly written and easily understood?
Easily understood
Conclusions illustrate the research results, recommendations and giving suggestions for future research
Partially
The references are full and grounded?
Yes
How adequate was the writing and used terminology?
Adequate
Remarks and suggestions to the authors of the article
It would be worth specifying, in addition to the geometric dimensions of the installation, also technical data about the installation. For example, what device did you use to measure the temperature, what is the productivity of the fan
I confirm that there is no conflict of interests regarding reviewed article.
I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have insignificant reservations, as outlined above.