Review of an article submitted to the conference

Approval status: Accept after acknowledging of remarks
Date Published: 16.05.2021 - 22:32
The article's title reflects the content and purpose of the article? 
Yes
Was the aim of the work clearly defined and successfully accomplished? 
Partially
Does the article embrace contemporary issues in the area? 
Yes
Does the article contain new and not published results? 
I do not know
Was the article clearly written and easily understood? 
Difficult
Conclusions illustrate the research results, recommendations and giving suggestions for future research 
Partially
The references are full and grounded? 
No
How adequate was the writing and used terminology? 
Rather adequate
Remarks and suggestions to the authors of the article 

Dear authors,

Please check all abreviations in the paper and add missing explanations to the text - for example I can't find meanings of LPR, NPS, NPR etc.

Please check whether the number "boiling point of 28 -450 C" in the second paragraph is correct.

Experimental part doesn't contain any information about authors contribution.

It is non clear where the literature sources are referenced to.

Englsh in the abstract should be improved.

I confirm that there is no conflict of interests regarding reviewed article. 
I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.