Article’s title
The article's title reflects the content and purpose of the article?
Yes
Was the aim of the work clearly defined and successfully accomplished?
Partially
Does the article embrace contemporary issues in the area?
Yes
Does the article contain new and not published results?
I do not know
Was the article clearly written and easily understood?
Easily understood
Conclusions illustrate the research results, recommendations and giving suggestions for future research
Yes
The references are full and grounded?
Yes
How adequate was the writing and used terminology?
Adequate
Remarks and suggestions to the authors of the article
The publication does not provide sufficient justification for the choice of the two methods of strategic diagnostics.
The use of GAP method is not standard. It is rather the author's approach. There is nothing about this innovation in the article.
But in general the material of the article contains some scientific novelty and has practical value for non-public organizations of such profile.
I confirm that there is no conflict of interests regarding reviewed article.
I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have insignificant reservations, as outlined above.