The article's title reflects the content and purpose of the article?
Yes
Was the aim of the work clearly defined and successfully accomplished?
Partially
Does the article embrace contemporary issues in the area?
Partially
Does the article contain new and not published results?
Yes
Was the article clearly written and easily understood?
Easily understood
Conclusions illustrate the research results, recommendations and giving suggestions for future research
Partially
The references are full and grounded?
Partially
How adequate was the writing and used terminology?
Rather adequate
Remarks and suggestions to the authors of the article
The actuality of the research, described in the paper, should be clarified. Future research directions should be proposed in the Conclusions.
English should be revised.
I confirm that there is no conflict of interests regarding reviewed article.
I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have insignificant reservations, as outlined above.