Review of an article submitted to the conference

Approval status: Accept without acknowledging of remarks
Date Published: 07.10.2019 - 17:01
The article's title reflects the content and purpose of the article? 
Yes
Was the aim of the work clearly defined and successfully accomplished? 
Yes
Does the article embrace contemporary issues in the area? 
Yes
Does the article contain new and not published results? 
I do not know
Was the article clearly written and easily understood? 
Easily understood
Conclusions illustrate the research results, recommendations and giving suggestions for future research 
No
The references are full and grounded? 
Partially
How adequate was the writing and used terminology? 
Adequate
Remarks and suggestions to the authors of the article 

1. It is not advisable to leave blank pages (it should be completely filled).
2. The article contains an overview of computer-assisted translation systems. What is the scientific novelty of the paper?

I confirm that there is no conflict of interests regarding reviewed article. 
I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have insignificant reservations, as outlined above.