Review of an article submitted to the conference

Approval status: Accept after acknowledging of remarks
Date Published: 07.10.2019 - 11:58
The article's title reflects the content and purpose of the article? 
Yes
Was the aim of the work clearly defined and successfully accomplished? 
Partially
Does the article embrace contemporary issues in the area? 
Yes
Does the article contain new and not published results? 
Yes
Was the article clearly written and easily understood? 
Understood with effort
Conclusions illustrate the research results, recommendations and giving suggestions for future research 
Partially
The references are full and grounded? 
Yes
How adequate was the writing and used terminology? 
Adequate
Remarks and suggestions to the authors of the article 

The article needs some corrections.
You don't need to write explanatiomns in brackets after headings such as "Introduction (use style: Heading)".
If there is a list, number it.
Recheck your English writing style, pay attention to articles, especially the sentence structure.

I confirm that there is no conflict of interests regarding reviewed article. 
I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have insignificant reservations, as outlined above.

Comments

Oleksandr.I.Belei
reviewer

thanks for the comments.
we will try to take them into account when editing the article.

Attachment 
AttachmentSize
belej-lea-2019.pdf990.25 KB
Wed, 10/09/2019 - 14:48