The article's title reflects the content and purpose of the article?
Yes
Was the aim of the work clearly defined and successfully accomplished?
Yes
Does the article embrace contemporary issues in the area?
Yes
Does the article contain new and not published results?
I do not know
Was the article clearly written and easily understood?
Easily understood
Conclusions illustrate the research results, recommendations and giving suggestions for future research
Partially
The references are full and grounded?
Partially
How adequate was the writing and used terminology?
Adequate
Remarks and suggestions to the authors of the article
The algorithm, mentioned in a title, should be presented in a pare, let me say, in a brighter way - as for now, it was described not as the algorithm should be presented. Authors might might want to look at
https://www.edrawsoft.com/explain-algorithm-flowchart.php
Authors should pay more attention to punctuation, especially in lists.
It might improve the paper if the autors reveal ideas of future research.
I confirm that there is no conflict of interests regarding reviewed article.
I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.