The article's title reflects the content and purpose of the article?
Partially
Was the aim of the work clearly defined and successfully accomplished?
No
Does the article embrace contemporary issues in the area?
No
Does the article contain new and not published results?
I do not know
Was the article clearly written and easily understood?
Difficult
Conclusions illustrate the research results, recommendations and giving suggestions for future research
No
The references are full and grounded?
Partially
How adequate was the writing and used terminology?
Rather adequate
Remarks and suggestions to the authors of the article
-
I confirm that there is no conflict of interests regarding reviewed article.
I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to state that I do not consider it to be of an acceptable scientific standard, for reasons outlined above.