The article's title reflects the content and purpose of the article?
Partially
Was the aim of the work clearly defined and successfully accomplished?
Partially
Does the article embrace contemporary issues in the area?
No
Does the article contain new and not published results?
Yes
Was the article clearly written and easily understood?
Understood with effort
Conclusions illustrate the research results, recommendations and giving suggestions for future research
Partially
The references are full and grounded?
Yes
How adequate was the writing and used terminology?
Adequate
Remarks and suggestions to the authors of the article
Authors should give some reasons why they should develop their own system, will it be the first system in the world? Did nobody else develop nothing like this before? If yes, why those previous systems can not be used again? What are the functions of the system? In Conclusions, why authors refer to other works, did authors cite the conclusions? The perspectives of future work are unclear.
I confirm that there is no conflict of interests regarding reviewed article.
I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have insignificant reservations, as outlined above.