Article’s title
The article's title reflects the content and purpose of the article?
Yes
Was the aim of the work clearly defined and successfully accomplished?
Partially
Does the article embrace contemporary issues in the area?
Yes
Does the article contain new and not published results?
Yes
Was the article clearly written and easily understood?
Understood with effort
Conclusions illustrate the research results, recommendations and giving suggestions for future research
Yes
The references are full and grounded?
Partially
How adequate was the writing and used terminology?
Adequate
Remarks and suggestions to the authors of the article
References have to be written rather in the alphabetical order or in th order of their appearance in the paper. Your references are chaotical and not all of them are mentioned in the text. Correct it.
I confirm that there is no conflict of interests regarding reviewed article.
I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have insignificant reservations, as outlined above.
Comments
Thanks for your review! I have already corrected mistakes, which are connected with references in my article. All references are mentioned in the text and are listed in alphabetical order.