Review of an article submitted to the conference

Article’s title

CFD-Modeling of Thermal Agent Flow Through a Layer of Barley Brewer’s Spent Grain

The article's title reflects the content and purpose of the article?

Yes

Was the aim of the work clearly defined and successfully accomplished?

Yes

Does the article embrace contemporary issues in the area?

Yes

Does the article contain new and not published results?

I do not know

Was the article clearly written and easily understood?

Easily understood

Conclusions illustrate the research results, recommendations and giving suggestions for future research

Yes

The references are full and grounded?

Yes

How adequate was the writing and used terminology?

Adequate

Remarks and suggestions to the authors of the article

The secondary use of brewing grain to obtain food additives, fertilizers or biofuel involves drying it. The paper substantiates the advantages of filtration drying for dewatering high-moisture dispersed thermolabile material. The secondary use of brewing grain to obtain food additives, fertilizers or biofuel involves drying it. The paper substantiates the advantages of filtration drying for dewatering high-moisture dispersed thermolabile material. The coefficients of the Darcy-Weisbach equation were obtained. The results of numerical modeling of the hydraulic resistance of a layer of dried beer grains depending on the fictitious speed of the drying agent and the height of the material layer are presented. A comparison of calculated and experimental data was made, which indicates the adequacy of the proposed calculation algorithm.
I believe that the work was performed at a high scientific level.

I confirm that there is no conflict of interests regarding reviewed article.

I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.