Article’s title
The article's title reflects the content and purpose of the article?
Yes
Was the aim of the work clearly defined and successfully accomplished?
Yes
Does the article embrace contemporary issues in the area?
Yes
Does the article contain new and not published results?
Yes
Was the article clearly written and easily understood?
Easily understood
Conclusions illustrate the research results, recommendations and giving suggestions for future research
Yes
The references are full and grounded?
Partially
How adequate was the writing and used terminology?
Adequate
Remarks and suggestions to the authors of the article
Dear authors, the studied region is not very popular among scientists. And there are quite a few publications on this region related to the change in ice cover.
You do not refer to recent research done by Ukrainian scientists in 2020 in the research region. We ask that you mention this work in your article whenever possible.
Marusazh, K., Savchyn, I., Lozynskyi, V., & Petryk, Y. (2020, September). Preliminary results of changes in the marine-terminating part of Trooz Glacier (West Antarctica) during 2001–2020. In Second EAGE Workshop on Assessment of Landslide Hazards and impact on communities (Vol. 2020, No. 1, pp. 1-5). European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers.
https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202055006
I confirm that there is no conflict of interests regarding reviewed article.
I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.