Article’s title
The article's title reflects the content and purpose of the article?
Yes
Was the aim of the work clearly defined and successfully accomplished?
Yes
Does the article embrace contemporary issues in the area?
Yes
Does the article contain new and not published results?
Yes
Was the article clearly written and easily understood?
Easily understood
Conclusions illustrate the research results, recommendations and giving suggestions for future research
Yes
The references are full and grounded?
Yes
How adequate was the writing and used terminology?
Adequate
Remarks and suggestions to the authors of the article
The article contains far reaching scientific results devoted to the development of an advanced method based on the gas chromatographic analysis, which is intended to control quality of industrial carotene preparations. Authors also have raised the important problem of methylene chloride traces in the product that requires its additional purification.
As to remarks, the term ‘Chromatic’ in the article’s title should be replaced with ‘Chromatographic’.
The article can be published in public sources.
I confirm that there is no conflict of interests regarding reviewed article.
I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have insignificant reservations, as outlined above.