Review of an article submitted to the conference

Approval status: Reject
Date Published: 11.11.2018 - 22:51
The article's title reflects the content and purpose of the article? 
Partially
Was the aim of the work clearly defined and successfully accomplished? 
Partially
Does the article embrace contemporary issues in the area? 
No
Does the article contain new and not published results? 
No
Was the article clearly written and easily understood? 
Not clear
Conclusions illustrate the research results, recommendations and giving suggestions for future research 
Partially
The references are full and grounded? 
No
How adequate was the writing and used terminology? 
Not adequate
Remarks and suggestions to the authors of the article 

the article is not recommended for printing

I confirm that there is no conflict of interests regarding reviewed article. 
I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to state that I do not consider it to be of an acceptable scientific standard, for reasons outlined above.