USE OF GEOINFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR FIXING THE FACTS OF ECOCIDE IN UKRAINE

Remote Sensing & GIS for Environmental Monitoring

Authors

First and Last Name Academic degree E-mail Affiliation
Fedir Hluhan No ozvic [at] ukr.net NATIONAL SPACE FACILITIES CONTROL and TEST CENTER
Kyiv, Ukraine
Viktor Mamariev Ph.D. ozvic [at] ukr.net NATIONAL SPACE FACILITIES CONTROL and TEST CENTER
Kyiv, Ukraine
Viktor Ozhinskyi Ph.D. ozvic [at] ukr.net NATIONAL SPACE FACILITIES CONTROL and TEST CENTER
Kyiv, Ukraine
Liubov Yankiv-Vitkovska Ph.D. liubov.m.yankiv-vitkovska [at] lpnu.ua Lviv Polytechnic National University
Lviv, Ukraine
Bohdan Dzhuman Ph.D. bohdan.b.dzhuman [at] lpnu.ua Lviv Polytechnic National University
Lviv, Ukraine

I and my co-authors (if any) authorize the use of the Paper in accordance with the Creative Commons CC BY license

First published on this website: 23.08.2023 - 14:44
Abstract 

The intensive development of weapons, forms and methods of armed struggle in armed conflicts of the 20th-21st centuries significantly increased the long-term negative impact on the natural environment and actualized the need to formalize generally accepted approaches to minimizing the impact of hostilities on the natural environment as components of international law.

As a result, the Additional Protocol to the Geneva Conventions of August 12, 1949, relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I) of June 8, 1977, prohibits to the parties of an armed conflict to use methods or means of warfare intended, which are intended to inflict or, as can be expected, will cause extensive long-term and serious damage to the natural environment (Article 35). At the same time, the application of measures to cause damage to the natural environment as one of the forms of reprisals is prohibited by the specified protocol.

During the large-scale invasion of the russian federation into the territory of Ukraine on February 24, 2022, the russian occupation forces captured the Chornobyl and Zaporizhzhya NPPs, the Kakhovka HPP and other critical infrastructure facilities. Objectively, as a result of the violation of their regular functioning, the risks of emergency situations with potentially catastrophic consequences for the population and the natural environment have significantly increased. This determined the extreme relevance of remote monitoring of the situation at such facilities.

The subject of this publication is the results of remote sensing monitoring of the state of one such critical infrastructure facility, namely the Kakhovka HPP.

References 

Belenok V., Derkach D. & Rul N. (2017) Use of aerospace methods and image processing methods of remote sensing of the Earth for environmental monitoring of Kakhovka reservoir. Astronomical School’s Report, vol.13 (1). P. 54 – 63. URL:https://doi.org/10.18372/2411-6602.13.09

Liashenko, D., Belenok, V., Spitsa, R., Pavlyuk, D., Boiko, O. (2020). Landslide GIS modelling with QGIS software. In: XIV International Scientific Conference on Monitoring of Geological Processes and Ecological Condition of the Environment. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. Kyiv, Ukraine. URL: https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202056069

Lyalko V., Elistratova L. & Apostolov A. (2014). Use of the data of ground and space monitorings of the environment temperature for the analysis of modern changes of the climate in Ukraine. Report of the National Acad. of Sciences of Ukraine, Issue 7. P. 109 – 115. doi:10.15407/dopovidi2014.07.109

Shellito B. (2019) Introduction to Geospatial Technologies. 5th ed. Freeman & Company, W. H.. 624 p.

Shevchuk S., Shevchenko I. (2013) Determining the ecological state of reservoirs using remote monitoring methods // Land reclamation and water management,  vol. 100 (2). P. 42-53.

Zatserkovnyi V., Tishaiev I., Virchilo I. & Demidov V. (2016) Geoinformation systems in Earth sciences. Nizhyn : NDU named by M. Gogol. 510 p.