1. Home
  2. GeoTerrace
  3. All Submission
  4. Theoretical aspects and practical implementation of creating geoportals

Theoretical aspects and practical implementation of creating geoportals

Remote Sensing & GIS for Environmental Monitoring

Authors

First and Last Name Academic degree E-mail Affiliation
Volodymyr Romaniuk Ph.D. VolodymyRomaniuk [at] gmail.com Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas
Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine
Oleh Burin No VolodymyRomaniuk [at] gmail.com Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas
Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine

I and my co-authors (if any) authorize the use of the Paper in accordance with the Creative Commons CC BY license

First published on this website: 27.08.2023 - 11:34
Abstract 

This article is devoted to researching the potential of geoportals as an effective tool for monitoring newly formed territorial communities. In modern conditions, territorial changes take place at different levels - from the unification of villages to the creation of new municipalities. Tracking and analyzing such changes requires new approaches and tools, among which geoportals play a significant role.

The purpose of the study is to determine the capabilities of geoportals in the context of monitoring newly formed territorial communities. The paper analyzes modern trends in geo-information technologies, studies methods and approaches to monitoring territorial changes. Methods of creating geoportals are considered in detail. The given example illustrates the interaction of different programming languages in a complex when creating geoportals

Keywords 
geoportal
PROGRAMMING
geospatial data
geo-information technologies
References 
  1. Butenko E., Lutskyi V. (2018) Comparative analysis of efficiency of geoportals of Ukraine and the European Union. Zemleustrii, kadastr i monitorynh zemel, 2 (18), 13p. DOI: 10.31548/zemleustriy2018.02.058
  2. Crompvoets J., Vancauwenberghe G., Ho S., Masser I., Timo de Vries W. (2018). Governance of national spatial data infrastructures in Europe. IJSDIR, Vol. 13, pp. 253–285, DOI: 10.2902/1725-0463.2018.13.art16.
  3. Gómez P. M., García M. P., Seco G. G., Santiago A. R., Johnson C. T. (2019). The Americas’ Spatial Data Infrastructure. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 8(10), 432; DOI: 10.3390/ijgi8100432.
  4. Guigoz Y., Giuliani G., Nonguierma A., Lehmann A., Mlisa A., Ray N. (2017). Spatial Data Infrastructures in Africa: A Gap Analysis. Journal of Environmental Informatics, 30 (1), рр. 53–62.
  5. Karpinskyi Yu. O., Liashchenko A. A., Makarenko D. H., CHERIN A.  (2021) National geospatial data infrastructure of Ukraine in the world dimension: state and urgent tasks of development and sustainable functioning. Cuchasni dosiahnennia heodezychnoi nauky ta vyrobnytstva, 1 (41),  – 9 p.
  6. Pashova L, Bandrova T. (2017). A brief overview of current status of European spatial data infrastructures − relevant developments and perspectives for Bulgaria, Geo. Inform. Science, 20:2, pp. 97–108, DOI:10.1080/ 10095020.2017. 1323524.
  7. Romaniuk V. V., Prykhodko M., Kukhtar D., Bodnaruk I., Dovhan I.  (2021). Algorithm of Creating a Cartographic Basis for Newly-Formed Territorial Communities. Geoinformatics 2021. – 5 p. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.20215521028