MONITORING, ASSESSMENT AND ADMINISTRATION OF WAR CONSEQUENCES AND POST-WAR RECONSTRUCTION: REMOTE SENSING AND GIS ECONOMICAL APPROACHES

Fixation, Monitoring & Assessment of War Consequences and Post-War Reconstruction (NEW)

Authors

First and Last Name Academic degree E-mail Affiliation
Alina Yakymchuk Sc.D. alinayakim [at] ukr.net University of informational technologies and management
Rzeszów, Poland
Tatiana Byrkovych Sc.D. byrkovychtetiana [at] gmail.com Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts
Kyiv, Ukraine
Stepan Kuzmych No kuzmych_vg21 [at] nuwm.edu.ua National University of Water and Environmental Engineering
Rivne, Ukraine

I and my co-authors (if any) authorize the use of the Paper in accordance with the Creative Commons CC BY license

First published on this website: 22.08.2023 - 23:48
Abstract 

The aftermath of war conflicts leaves a trail of destruction and displacement, demanding comprehensive strategies for fixation, monitoring, and assessment of war-related consequences. This article explores the application of remote sensing methods and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) in monitoring and assessing the impacts of war, particularly focusing on destruction, landscape transformation, and post-war reconstruction. The integration of remote sensing and GIS technologies provides valuable insights into the extent of damage, aids in demining efforts, and contributes to informed decision-making during reconstruction. This paper presents a comprehensive overview of successful GIS applications employed by various countries during wartime, highlighting their contributions to monitoring, assessment, and reconstruction efforts

References 

Bazi, Y., & Melgani, F. (2011). Remote sensing image fusion using the discrete wavelet transform. Information Fusion, 8(2), 143-156.

Distribution of geospatial industry market revenue worldwide from 2013 to 2020, by technology (2023). URL: https://www.statista.com/statistics/699497/worldwide-geospatial-industry-distribution-by-technology.

Geographic Information System (GIS) market revenue in the United States from 2014 to 2025. (2023) URL: https://www.statista.com/statistics/784262/geographic-information-system-market-size-in-the-us.

Kuzmych L, Yakymchuk A.(2022). Environmental Sustainability: Economical and Organizational Aspects of WEF Nexus. 16th International Conference Monitoring of Geological Processes and Ecological Condition of the Environment, Nov 2022, Volume 2022, p.1 – 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.2022580009

Lewandowska, A.; Ullah, Z.; AlDhaen, F.S.; AlDhaen, E.; Yakymchuk, A. (2023). Enhancing Organizational Social Sustainability: Exploring the Effect of Sustainable Leadership and the Moderating Role of Micro-Level CSR. Sustainability 2023, 15, 11853. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/su151511853. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11853.

Li, J., & Zhou, W. (2021). A review of GIS applications in post-war land cover mapping and reconstruction. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 15(1), 012219.

Longley, P. A., Goodchild, M. F., Maguire, D. J., & Rhind, D. W. (2015). Geographic information systems and science. John Wiley & Sons.

Sarker, M. L. R., & Ahmed, M. (2021). Using GIS and remote sensing for demining and post-war reconstruction: A review. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 31(3), 457-477.

Shahtahmassebi, A. R., & Aryal, J. (2021). Assessment of war-induced destruction and its implications for post-war recovery: A case study of Afghanistan using remote sensing and GIS. Sustainability, 13(7), 3672.

Qiao, G., Zhang, H., Chen, Y., & Han, Z. (2021). Integrated application of remote sensing and GIS for assessing war-related landscape changes and reconstruction in Yemen. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 12(1), 2292-2307.

Yakymchuk A., Valyukh A., Poliakova N., Skorokhod I., Sak T. (2023). Intellectual economic development: cost and efficiency indicators. ECONOMICS. Journal. Volume 11, № 1, Р. 159-178. eISSN 2303-5013. URL: https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/eoik-2023-0006.