Methods of geomatic monitoring technologically loaded territories

Fixation, Monitoring & Assessment of War Consequences and Post-War Reconstruction (NEW)

Authors

First and Last Name Academic degree E-mail Affiliation
Svitlana Nesterenko Ph.D. NesterenkoS2208 [at] gmail.com Lviv Polytechnic National University
Lviv, Ukraine
Grigoriy Sharyi Sc.D. shariy.grigoriy61 [at] gmail.com National University «Yuri Kondratyuk Poltava Polytechnic»
Poltava, Ukraine
Angelina Trifonova No aaaangelinaaa.2704 [at] gmail.com National University «Yuri Kondratyuk Poltava Polytechnic»
Poltava, Ukraine

I and my co-authors (if any) authorize the use of the Paper in accordance with the Creative Commons CC BY license

First published on this website: 27.08.2023 - 16:23
Abstract 

It was noted that the territory of Ukraine is saturated with technogenically loaded  objects with active geodynamic processes, which require constant monitoring to detect deformations, especially during military operations. For a comprehensive assessment of indicators of threats in potentially dangerous industrial territories and to determine deformations of the earth's surface, it is proposed to consider methods of geomatic monitoring of territories as a system that includes ground-based geodetic methods, remote sensing of the Earth and geographic information systems (GIS). This approach will make it possible to study territories, in particular the state of the Earth's surface, depending on the conditions of its functioning.

References 

Alicandro M. (2015). The Role of Geomatics for Civil and Environmental Monitoring. Conference: 21st Ka and Broadcast Communications Conference. 14 October 2015. Bologna.

Vasiukhyn M., Kasym A., Tkachenko A., Yvanyk Yu. (2013). Methods and tools for building an automated system for agroecological monitoring, certification and assessment of lands contaminated as a result of anthropogenic impact. Vestnyk KhNTU, № 1 (46). P. 240-242.

Tsatsaris A., Kalogeropoulos K., Stathopoulos N., Louka P., Tsanakas K., Tsesmelis D.E.., Krassanakis V., Petropoulos G.P., Pappas V. & Chalkias C. (2021). Geoinformation Technologies in Support of Environmental Hazards Monitoring under Climate Change. ISPRS IJGI., 10(2), 94.

Peresadko V.A., Sinna O.I., Viatkin K.V., Bodnia O.V. (2012). Geoinformation provision of nature conservation areas. Problems of continuous geographical education and cartography. Collection of scientific papers. Kharkiv. Vol. 15. P. 74‒77.

Brockmann E., Ineichen D., Marti U., Schaer S., Schlatter A., Villiger A. (2012). Determination of Tectonic Movements in the Swiss Alps Using GNSS and Levelling. Intern. Association of Geodesy Symposia, 136, 689‒695.

Starovierov V. (2020). Geodetic monitoring of hydrotechnical structures using an automated surveillance system. Urban planning and territorial planning, 74, 298‒307.  

Tretyak, K., Palianytsia, B. (2022). Research of the environmental temperature influence on the horizontal displacements of the Dnieper hydroelectric station dam (according to GNSS measurements). Reports on Geodesy and Geoinformatics, Vol. 113(1), 1‒10.

Trevoho I., Horb A., Meleshko O. (2017). Application of synthetic aperture radars for high-precision geospatial monitoring. Modern achievements of geodetic science and production. Lviv. 44‒46.

Ostrovskyi A., Moroz O. (2002). Geomonitoring in geodynamics and increasing the accuracy of geodetic measurements by neutralizing atmospheric effects. Proceedings of the scientific and technical symposium «Geomonitoring‒2002», 12‒15.

Sharyi H., Nesterenko S., Stoiko N.  (2022). Ways of revitalization of Dnipro reservoirs. Journal LNEU: Architecture and Building, 23, 118‒124.