Cylindrical spirt bubble level with a bubble that is heavier than the filling liquid

Engineering Surveying & Deformation Monitoring

Authors

First and Last Name Academic degree E-mail Affiliation
Evgen Ilkiv Ph.D. evgen_ilkiv [at] ukr.net Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas
Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine
Mykola Prykhodko Sc.D. prihodkon [at] ukr.net Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas
Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine
Myron Halyarnyk No geo.myron_zem [at] ukr.net Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas
Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine
Igor Chepurnyi No igor.chepurnyi [at] gmail.com Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas
Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine
Maksym Yershov No madmax2000tvin [at] gmail.com Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas
Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine

I and my co-authors (if any) authorize the use of the Paper in accordance with the Creative Commons CC BY license

First published on this website: 10.08.2023 - 12:46
Abstract 

Geodesy is always about accuracy, so all devices used in it or related fields have spirit bubble levels (cylindrical or round). They are needed for placing devices in the working area or for determining the position of the angle of inclination of some surface. The first concerns both opto-electronic and opto-mechanical devices. In some cases, it is more convenient to use the level in which the indicator body - the bubble - is located in the lower part of the ampoule. In particular, such a level can be used in compressed conditions during surveying or in construction to control the horizontality of the ceiling. Therefore, in this study, the task is to determine the requirements for the filling liquid of the level and for the liquid bubble, which should be heavier. Two pairs of substances that will give the desired result were also selected.

References 

Kalynych, I. V. (2021). Electronic geodetic devices. Hoverla. Р. 6-9, 94, 98, 117.

Kukhar, M., Myronenko, M., Kobzan, S., Maslii, L. (2023). ANALYSIS OF THE MAIN ASPECTS OF MODERN TOOLS FOR SOLVING GEODETIC PROBLEMS: Modern systems of science and education in the USA, EU and other countries. January, 2023. P. 37–42.

Orlov, A. Ya. (1961). Selected Works (Vol. 2). House of the Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR.

Ostrovsky, A. L., Moroz, O. I., Tarnavskyi, V. L. (2007). Geodesy (Vol. 2). Lviv Polytechnic. Р. 28-39, 152-154.

Tovchigrenko, S.S. (1965). Bubble Spirit Levels and methods of their research. Moscow, Russia: (n.p.).

Trevoho, I., Ilkiv, E., Halyarnyk, M., Hrushko, O. (2021). The foundation subsidence of the tower-type structures. International Conference of Young Professionals, GeoTerrace 2021.

Trevoho, I., Ilkiv, E., Halyarnyk, M., Kukhtar, D., Hrushko, O. (2022). Research and improvement of bimetal benchmark construction. International Conference of Young Professionals, GeoTerrace 2022.

Zavarin, D.A. (2015).  Modern equipment, devices and research methods in land utilization and cadastre II Problems of entrepreneurial, investment and construction activity. Materials of the XVII-th       scientific - technical conferenc. ANO IPEV. P. 114-120.