Geodetic surveying plays a pivotal role in architectural preservation, urban planning, and construction projects. This study presents a comparative assessment of three prominent survey methods: laser scanning, lidar using an iPhone 13 Pro, and total station survey using a GEOMAX ZOOM instrument. The research was conducted on the facade of the 6th academic building of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine in Kyiv. Control points were strategically positioned on the building facade to facilitate accurate measurements.
The study focused on measuring the distances between control points and compared the results from each survey method to the control measurements. Root mean square (RMS) values were calculated to quantify the accuracy of each technique. The obtained RMS values were as follows: laser scanning (Leica ScanStation C10) - 0.0205 meters, lidar (iPhone 13 Pro) - 0.1694 meters, and total station survey (GEOMAX ZOOM) - 0.0135 meters.
Based on the results, the total station and laser scanning methods exhibited superior accuracy. Laser scanning demonstrated efficient data acquisition, producing detailed 3D models. However, it is associated with higher costs. The total station method showcased exceptional accuracy at the expense of longer completion times. Lidar using an iPhone 13 Pro offered swift execution and acceptable accuracy, making it suitable for tasks such as material estimation.
These findings provide valuable insights for professionals and researchers in selecting optimal survey methods based on project requirements. The study contributes to advancing geodetic survey practices, aiding decision-making in architectural preservation, urban planning, and construction endeavors.
Nik Azhan Hakim, N. N. A., Razali, R., Mohd Said, M. S., Muhamad, M. A. H., Abdul Rahim, H. and Mokhtar, M. A. (2023). Accuracy Assessment on Detail Survey Plan Using iPhone 13 Pro Max LiDAR Sensor. International Journal of Geoinformatics. Volume 19, Issue 5, 79 – 86. https://doi.org/10.52939/ijg.v19i5.2665.
Verma, M. K. and Yadav, M. (2023). Survey Planning for Documentation of a Monument for the Understanding, Preservation and Restoration. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci, Volume 48, Issue M-2-2023, 1607–1612. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-2-2023-1607-2023.
Spreafico, A., Chiabrando, F., Teppati Losè, L. and Giulio Tonolo, F., (2021). The Ipad Pro Built-In Lidar Sensor: 3d Rapid Mapping Tests and Quality Assessment. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. 43, 63-69. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B1-2021-63-2021.
Razali, M. H., Idris, A. N., Nor, T. N. A. T. M. and Ghazali, R., (2021). Accuracy Assessment On Point Cloud Dataset from Terrestrial Laser Scanner with Different Objects Surface Properties. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science : IOP Publishing. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/767/1/012007.
Abd-Elmaaboud, A., El-Tokhey, M., Ragheb, A. and Mogahed, Y., (2019). Comparative Assessment of Terrestrial Laser Scanner Against Traditional Surveying Methods. Int. J. Eng. Appl. Sci, Vol. 6, 79-84.
El Meouche, R., Hijazi, I., Poncet, P., Abunemeh, M. and Rezoug, M., (2016). UAV Photogrammetry Implementation to Enhance Land Surveying, Comparisons, and Possibilities. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing & Spatial Information Sciences , Vol. 42, 107-114. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W2-107-2016.