Pleistocene climate fluctuations recorded in the magnetic susceptibility of the longest LPSs of Ukraine

Earth Surface Processes & Geodynamics

Authors

First and Last Name Academic degree E-mail Affiliation
Vladimir Bakhmutov Sc.D. bakhmutovvg [at] gmail.com Institute of Geophysics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Kyiv, Ukraine
Institute of Geophysics Polish Academy of Sciences
Kyiv, Ukraine
Dmytro Hlavatskyi Ph.D. hlavatskyi [at] gmail.com Institute of Geophysics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Kyiv, Ukraine
Galyna Melnyk Ph.D. mg2005 [at] ukr.net Institute of Geophysics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Kyiv, Ukraine
Sergii Mychak Sc.D. sergiimychak [at] gmail.com Institute of Geophysics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Kyiv, Ukraine
Semyon Cherkes No semyoncherkes [at] gmail.com Institute of Geophysics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Kyiv, Ukraine

I and my co-authors (if any) authorize the use of the Paper in accordance with the Creative Commons CC BY license

First published on this website: 13.08.2022 - 20:07
Abstract 

The cyclical structure of loess-palaeosol deposits reflects the patterns of climate change and is a valuable archive of palaeoenvironmental information. In various regions of the distribution of the loess-soil sequences (LPSs), palaeoclimatic signals are differently "recorded" in the magnetic properties of rocks, types of fossil soils and the composition of the ancient vegetation. The similarity of variations in the recording of magnetic susceptibility and other palaeoclimate proxies in the same age marine and lake sediments confirms the possibility of palaeoclimatic reconstruction by magnetic properties. In this study, we present rock magnetic and magnetostratigraphic results, in comparison with the lithological-palaeopedological and palynological properties, obtained from the most complete Pleistocene LPSs in Ukraine, at the Roksolany and Vyazivok sections. Our data confirm that the magnetic susceptibility is a powerful tool in the reconstruction of palaeoenvironmental changes, and should be widely used in the study of loess and soil deposits, and in the resolving geological, economic, and environmental problems.

References 

Bakhmutov V., Hlavatskyi D. [2022] On the reliability of a stratigraphic interpretation that overlooks geophysical techniques and results when determining the age of loess-soil deposits – comment on Łanczont et al. (2022) “A remarkable last glacial loess sedimentation at Roxolany in the Dniester Liman (Southern Ukraine)”. Quaternary Science Reviews, 107668.

Bakhmutov V., Hlavatskyi D., Stepanchuk V., Poliachenko, Ie. [2018] Rock magnetism and magnetostratigraphy of loess-palaesol sections – Lower Paleolithic sites of Podolian upland (Medzhybizh, Holovchintsi). 12th International Conference on Monitoring of Geological Processes and Ecological Condition of the Environment, Kyiv, Ukraine, 1–5.

Bakhmutov V.G., Kazanskii A.Yu., Matasova G.G., Glavatskii D.V. [2017] Rock Magnetism and Magnetostratigraphy of the Loess-Sol Series of Ukraine (Roksolany, Boyanychi, and Korshev Sections). Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth, 53 (6), 65–86.

Bonchkovskyi O. The Loess-Palaeosol Sequence of Novyi Tik: A New Middle and Upper Pleistocene Record for Volyn’ Upland (North-West Ukraine). Quaternaire, 2020, 31, 281–308.

Bradák B., Seto Y., Nawrocki J. [2019] Significant Pedogenic and Palaeoenvironmental Changes during the Early Middle Pleistocene in Central Europe. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 534, 109335.

Gozhik P., Shelkoplyas V., Khristoforova T. [1995] Development Stages of Loessial and Facial Formation in Ukraine (Stratigraphy of loess in Ukraine). Annales Universitae Mariae Curie-Sklodowska, B (50), 65–74.

Haesaerts P., Damblon F., Gerasimenko N., Spagna P., Pirson S. [2016] The Late Pleistocene Loess-Palaeosol Sequence of Middle Belgium. Quaternary International, 411, 25–43.

Hlavatskyi D., Bakhmutov V. [2021] Early-Middle Pleistocene Magnetostratigraphic and Rock Magnetic Records of the Dolynske Section (Lower Danube, Ukraine) and Their Application to the Correlation of Loess-Palaeosol Sequences in Eastern and South-Eastern Europe. Quaternary, 4 (4), 43.

Hlavatskyi D.V., Bakhmutov V.G. [2020] Magnetostratigraphy and magnetic susceptibility of the best developed Pleistocene loess-palaeosol sequences of Ukraine: implications for correlation and proposed chronostratigraphic models. Geological Quarterly, 64 (3), 723–753.

Jordanova D., Laag C., Jordanova N., Lagroix F., Georgieva B., Ishlyamski D., Guyodo Y. [2022] A detailed magnetic record of Pleistocene climate and distal ash dispersal during the last 800 kyrs - The Suhia Kladenetz quarry loess-paleosol sequence near Pleven (Bulgaria). Global and Planetary Change, 214, 103840.

Kilifarska N.A., Bakhmutov V.G., Mel’nik G.V. [2015] Geomagnetic field and climate: Causal relations with some atmospheric variables. Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth, 51 (5), 768–785.

Kilifarska, N.A., Bakhmutov, V.G., Melnyk, G.V. [2020a] The geomagnetic field’s imprint on the twentieth century’s climate variability. Geological Society Special Publication, 497 (1), 205–227.

Kilifarska, N.A., Bakhmutov, V.G., Melnyk, G.V. [2020b] The hidden link between Earth’s magnetic field and climate. Elsevier, 215 p.

Laag C., Hambach U., Zeeden C., Lagroix F., Guyodo Y., Veres D., Jovanović M., Marković S.B. [2021] A Detailed Paleoclimate Proxy Record for the Middle Danube Basin Over the Last 430 Kyr: A Rock Magnetic and Colorimetric Study of the Zemun Loess-Paleosol Sequence. Frontiers in Earth Science, 9, 1–24.

Łanczont M., Mroczek P., Komar M., Fedorowicz S., Woronko B., Nawrocki J., Frankowski Z., Standzikowski K. [2022] A remarkable last glacial loess sedimentation at Roxolany in the Dniester Liman (Southern Ukraine). Quaternary Science Reviews, 285, 107521.

Matoshko A. [2021] Loess and its derivatives in a common sedimentary and geomorphic evolution of the East European Plain. Aeolian Research, 53, 100750.

Molnár D., Makó L., Cseh P., Sümegi P., Fekete I., Galović L. [2021] Middle and Late Pleistocene loess-palaeosol archives in East Croatia: Multi-proxy palaeoecological studies on Zmajevac and Šarengrad II sequences. Studia Quaternaria, 38, 3–17.

Nawrocki J., Bakhmutov V., Bogucki A., Dolecki, L. [1999] The Paleo- and Petromagnetic Record in the Polish and Ukrainian Loess-Paleosol Sequences. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth Part A Solid Earth and Geodesy, 24, 773–777.

Rousseau D.-D., Gerasimenko N., Matviischina Z., Kukla G. [2001] Late Pleistocene Environments of the Central Ukraine. Quaternary Research, 56, 349–356.

Shackleton N.J., Berger A., Peltier W.R. [1990] An alternative astronomical calibration of the lower Pleistocene timescale based on ODP Site 677. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 81, 251–261.

Sirenko O. [2021] Palaeoenvironmental Conditions of the Formation of Sediments of the Early Pliocene of Ukrainian Plain and the Vegetation Cover Dynamics. Geological Journal, 56, 839–850.

Sümegi P., Gulyás S., Molnár D., Sümegi B.P., Almond P.C., Vandenberghe J., Zhou L., Pál-Molnár E., Törőcsik T., Hao Q. et al. [2018] New Chronology of the Best Developed Loess/Paleosol Sequence of Hungary Capturing the Past 1.1 Ma: Implications for Correlation and Proposed Pan-Eurasian Stratigraphic Schemes. Quaternary Science Reviews, 191, 144–166.

Veklich M.F., Artyushenko A.T., Sirenko N.A., Dubnyak V.A., Mel’nichuk I.V., Parishkura S.I. [1967] Opornyye geologicheskiye razrezy antropogena Ukrainy. Naukova Dumka, Kyiv, pp. 13–50.  (in Russian).

Zeeden C., Hambach U., Obreht I., Hao Q., Abels H.A., Veres D., Lehmkuhl F., Gavrilov M.B., Marković S.B. [2018] Patterns and Timing of Loess-Paleosol Transitions in Eurasia: Constraints for Paleoclimate Studies. Global and Planetary Change, 162, 1–7.