Using Move software by geological field works

3d Modeling & Visualization for Geology & Mining

Authors

First and Last Name Academic degree E-mail Affiliation
Mariia Oliinyk No mariia.a.oliinyk [at] lpnu.ua Lviv Polytechnic National University
Lviv, Ukraine
Ihor Bubniak Ph.D. ihor.m.bubniak [at] lpnu.ua Lviv Polytechnic National University
Lviv, Ukraine
Yuriy Vikhot Ph.D. yuvik [at] ukr.net Lviv Polytechnic National University
Lviv, Ukraine
Ivan Franko National University
Lviv, Ukraine

I and my co-authors (if any) authorize the use of the Paper in accordance with the Creative Commons CC BY license

First publshed on this website: 04.11.2020 - 11:43
Abstract 

This paper is written about Field Move Clino and FieldMove programs and their capabilities. We describe the features of processing in field works. Advantages and disadvantages of using gadgets during geological field camp are indicated. These thesis demonstrate that Move software is the right solution for field geological work.

References 

Allmendinger, R. W., Siron, C. R., & Scott, C. P. (2017). Structural data collection with mobile devices: Accuracy, redundancy, and best practices. Journal of Structural Geology, 102, 98-112.
Brush, J. A., Pavlis, T. L., Hurtado, J. M., Mason, K. A., Knott, J. R., & Williams, K. E. (2019).Evaluation of field methods for 3-D mapping and 3-D visualization of complex metamorphic structure using multiview stereo terrain models from ground-based photography. Geosphere, 15(1), 188-221.
Bubniak, I. M., Bubniak, A. M., & Gavrilenko, O. D. (2020, May). Digital field geology. In Geoinformatics: Theoretical and Applied Aspects 2020 (Vol. 2020, No. 1, pp. 1-4).European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers.
Cawood, A. J., Bond, C. E., Howell, J. A., Butler, R. W., & Totake, Y. (2017). LiDAR, UAV or compass-clinometer? Accuracy, coverage and the effects on structural models. Journal of Structural Geology, 98, 67-82.
Lee, S., Suh, J., & Park, H. D. (2013). Smart Compass-Clinometer: A smartphone application for easy and rapid geological site investigation. Computers & Geosciences, 61, 32-42.
Lee, S., Suh, J., & Choi, Y. (2018). Review of smartphone applications for geoscience: current status, limitations, and future perspectives. Earth Science Informatics, 11(4), 463-486.
McCarthy, A., Cosgrave, R., & Meere, P. (2009). Use of the iPhone as a geological field tool: Practical benefits and technical limitations. EGUGA, 11727
MOVE structural geology software MOVE Core (Computer software). (2020.). Retrieved from https://www.petex.com/products/move-suite/
Novakova, L., & Pavlis, T. L. (2017). Assessment of the precision of smart phones and tablets for measurement of planar orientations: A case study. Journal of Structural Geology, 97, 93-103..
Pavlis, T., Hurtado, J., Langford, R., & Serpa, L. (2014). Lessons in modern digital field geology: Open source software, 3D techniques, and the new world of digital mapping. EGUGA, 2470..
Pavlis, T. L., Langford, R., Hurtado, J., & Serpa, L. (2010). Computer-based data acquisition and visualization systems in field geology: Results from 12 years of experimentation and future potential. Geosphere, 6(3), 275-294.
Sun, F., Weng, Y., & Grigsby, J. D. (2010). Smartphones for geological data collection-an android phone application. AGUFM, 2010, IN53B-1175.
Whitmeyer, S. J., Pyle, E. J., Pavlis, T. L., Swanger, W., & Roberts, L. (2019). Modern approaches to field data collection and mapping: Digital methods, crowdsourcing, and the future of statistical analyses. Journal of Structural Geology, 125, 29-40.