The topological constraints of the geospatial database (GDB) are determined by the rules of topological consistency of the geometry of spatial properties of objects and the semantic correspondence of spatial relations between objects. They are essential for producing quality geospatial data and ensuring the integrity of the GDB. In the conceptual model of topological restrictions for the geospatial database of a topographic map on a scale of 1:10000 (GDB TM 10K), the following main classes are defined: restrictions on the accuracy of the topological coincidence of the elements of the geometry of objects in the context of the map scale, restrictions on the topological consistency of the geometry of objects according to the rules of planar topology graph, topological coincidence of elements with common geometry and rules of topology of polygonal covering. The package of spatial relations of objects of the conceptual constraint model defines the rules of non-planar geometry for building a topological model of networks and the rules of semantic correspondence of spatial relations between objects of one and several types. The proposed conceptual model of topological constraints GDB TM 10K is based on relevant provisions of international standards in geographic information and takes into account modern requirements for the quality of topographic data as a basis for NSDI fundamental data sets and their usefulness for geoinformation modelling in applied GIS for various purposes. The generalization level of the essences of the conceptual model of topological constraints GDB TM 10K is focused on its use at various stages of the database life cycle, from the development of a specification for geospatial data sets, data collection and production to the creation of GDB and its use in applied GIS.
Blana, N., & Tsoulos, L. (2022). Constraint-Based Spatial Data Management for Cartographic Representation at Different Scales. Geographies, 2(2), 258-273, doi: 10.3390/geographies2020018
Crompvoets J., Vancauwenberghe G., Ho S., Masser I, Timo de Vries W. (2018). Governance of national spatial data infrastructures in Europe. IJSDIR, Vol.13, pp. 253-285, DOI: 10.2902/1725- 0463.2018.13.art16.
García, F. J., de las Cuevas, A., Marín, A., Martin, V., Sánchez, F. & González-Matesanz, F. J. (2013). New production environment for the National Topographic Database 1:25.000 (IGN-E). Intelligence for geographic databases. In Proceedings of the 26th ICC2013, Dresden, Germany, URL: https://icaci.org/files/documents/ICC2013/_extendedAbstract/415_proceeding.pdf.
Jakobsson, A. and Ilves, R. [2016] Reinventing the National Topographic Database, Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. XLI-B4, 733–736. DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B4-733-2016.
Kent, A.J. & Hopfstock, A. (2018). Topographic Mapping: Past, Present and Future. The Cartographic Journal, 55:4, 305-308, DOI: 10.1080/00087041.2018.1576973.
Ključanin, S. (2020). INSPIRE specifications in the service of making a topographic map. Geodetski list, 74(4), 373-387. URI: https://hrcak.srce.hr/251229 (accessed: 2024-08-22).
Karpinskyi, Y., Lyashchenko, A., Lazorenko-Hevel, N., Cherin, A., Kin, D., & Havryliuk, Y. (2021). Main state topographic map: Structure and principles of the creation A database. Paper presented at the 20th International Conference Geoinformatics: Theoretical and Applied Aspects, doi: 10.3997/2214‑4609.20215521043 Retrieved from www.scopus.com
Lazorenko-Hevel, N., Karpinskyi, Y., & Kin, D. (2021). Some peculiarities of creation (updating) of digital topographic maps for the seamless topographic database of the main state topographic map in Ukraine. Geoingegneria Ambientale e Mineraria, 162(1), 19-24. doi:10.19199/2021.1.1121-9041.019.
Mäs, S. and Reinhardt, W. (2009). Categories of geospatial and temporal integrity constraints.In International Conference on Advanced Geographic Information Systems and Web Services, GEOWS 2009, pages 146-151. IEEE Computer Society. https://www.unibw.de/geoinformatik/publikationen-und-vortraege/pdf-dateien-wissenschaftliche-publikationen/maes-geows2009.pdf.
OGC SFA (2010). OGC 06-103r4. Simple feature access – Part 1: Common architecture. 2010. https://www.ogc.org/standard/sfa/.
OGC SFS (2010). OGC 06-104r4. Simple feature access – Part 2: SQL option, 2010. https://www.ogc.org/standard/sfs/.
Olszewski R., Zieliński J., Pillich-Kolipińska, A., Fiedukowicz A., Głażewski A., & Kowalski P., 2013. Methodology of creating the new generation of official topographic maps in Poland. In Proceedings of the 26th ICC2013, Dresden, Germany, 680. URL: https://icaci.org/files/documents/ICC2013/_extendedAbstract/248_proceeding.pdf.
Servigne, S., Ubeda, T., Puricelli, A., and Laurini, R. (2000). A methodology for spatial consistency improvement of geographic databases. Geoinformatica, 4(1):7-34. DOI: 10.1023/A:1009824308542.