Remote monitoring of the activation of hazardous natural processes under the war in Ukraine

Fixation, Monitoring & Assessment of War Consequences and Post-War Reconstruction (NEW)

Authors

First and Last Name Academic degree E-mail Affiliation
Tetiana Orlenko Ph.D. tetianaorlenko96 [at] gmail.com State Institution “Scientific Centre for Aerospace Research of the Earth of the Institute of Geological Science of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine”
Kyiv, Ukraine
Olga Tytarenko Ph.D. olgatitarenko66 [at] ukr.net State Institution “Scientific Centre for Aerospace Research of the Earth of the Institute of Geological Science of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine”
Kyiv, Ukraine
Oleksandr Tsvyk No cvik_ov [at] ukr.net Kyiv National University of Taras Shevchenko
Kyiv, Ukraine
Dmytro Lyashenko Sc.D. uageog [at] gmail.com Kyiv National University of Taras Shevchenko
Kyiv, Ukraine

I and my co-authors (if any) authorize the use of the Paper in accordance with the Creative Commons CC BY license

First published on this website: 22.08.2024 - 10:50
Abstract 

This study details the specifics of monitoring hazardous natural processes in Ukraine during the ongoing war through the use of remote sensing data. It examines the experience of conducting remote monitoring in war-affected landscapes, focusing on the sensors employed, the data acquired, and the interpretation of this information. The paper compares natural processes and their alterations due to military activities. Key monitoring targets are identified, including trenches, dugouts, craters, vehicle tracks, exposures, blowout cones, dunes, ravines, and gullies, all of which may be activated or initiated by the war. The authors provide examples of how remote sensing technologies, particularly satellite surveys, can be utilized to detect hazardous natural processes. We repercussion that remote monitoring of these processes is crucial in the context of the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive remote monitoring to enhance situational awareness and reduce mitigate risks.

References 

Aimaiti, Y., Sanon, C., Koch, M., Baise, L. G., & Moaveni, B. (2022). War-related building damage assessment in Kyiv, Ukraine, using Sentinel-1 radar and Sentinel-2 optical images. Remote Sensing, 14(24), 6239. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14246239

de Matos‐Machado, R., Toumazet, J. P., Bergès, J. C., Amat, J. P., Arnaud‐Fassetta, G., Bétard, F., & Jacquemot, S. (2019). War landform mapping and classification on the Verdun battlefield (France) using airborne LiDAR and multivariate analysis. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 44(7), 1430-1448. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4607

Denysyk, H. (2016). Beligerative landscapes: Essence and classification. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Military-Special Sciences, 2(35), 19-23.

Forßbohm, U. (2011). Kriegs-End-Moränen, zum Denkmalwert der Trümmerberge in Berlin. In Graue Reihe des Instituts für Stadt- und Regionalplanung der Technischen Universität Berlin (Vol. 34). Berlin, Germany: Technische Universität Berlin.

Hesse, R. (2014). Geomorphological traces of conflict in high-resolution elevation models. Applied Geography, 46, 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.10.003

Koch, M., & El-Baz, F. (1998). Identifying the effects of the Gulf War on the geomorphic features of Kuwait by remote sensing and GIS. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 64(7), 739-746.

Turcotte, D. L., & Schubert, G. (2002). Geodynamics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807442