Article’s title
The article's title reflects the content and purpose of the article?
Yes
Was the aim of the work clearly defined and successfully accomplished?
Yes
Does the article embrace contemporary issues in the area?
Yes
Does the article contain new and not published results?
I do not know
Was the article clearly written and easily understood?
Difficult
Conclusions illustrate the research results, recommendations and giving suggestions for future research
Partially
The references are full and grounded?
Partially
How adequate was the writing and used terminology?
Rather adequate
Remarks and suggestions to the authors of the article
Very interesting results - the high conversion, selectivities etc.
But in my opinion the shown scheme is not enough to proof the conclusion. Maybe we'll found the answer in the full presentation at the conference.
I confirm that there is no conflict of interests regarding reviewed article.
I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.