Water Occurrence Mapping of Kakhovka Reservoir after the dam destruction

Fixation, Monitoring & Assessment of War Consequences and Post-War Reconstruction (NEW)

Authors

First and Last Name Academic degree E-mail Affiliation
Anna Kozlova Ph.D. ak.koann [at] gmail.com Scientific Centre for Aerospace Research of the Earth of the Institute of Geological Sciences of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Kyiv, Ukraine
Liudmyla Lischenko Ph.D. lischenkolp [at] gmail.com Scientific Centre for Aerospace Research of the Earth of the Institute of Geological Sciences of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Kyiv, Ukraine
Artem Andreiev Ph.D. artem.a.andreev [at] gmail.com Scientific Centre for Aerospace Research of the Earth of the Institute of Geological Sciences of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Kyiv, Ukraine
Mykola Lubskyi Ph.D. nickolo1990 [at] gmail.com Scientific Centre for Aerospace Research of the Earth of the Institute of Geological Sciences of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Kyiv, Ukraine
Artur Lysenko Ph.D. artur.r.lysenko [at] gmail.com Scientific Centre for Aerospace Research of the Earth of the Institute of Geological Sciences of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Kyiv, Ukraine

I and my co-authors (if any) authorize the use of the Paper in accordance with the Creative Commons CC BY license

First published on this website: 21.08.2024 - 14:44
Abstract 

After the Dam destruction on June 6, 2023, the Kakhovka Reservoir was extremely drained. However, the water occurrence varies in the different areas during the year. The frequency of water occurrence is an important driver for climate, hydrology, appearance, and differentiation of new habitats. In this paper, we have performed the water occurrence mapping of the Kakhovka Reservoir from June 20, 2023, to May 25, 2024. For each selected date of the study period, we have used Sentinel-2 imagery to obtain water masks based on the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI). It revealed that the flooded area of the reservoir’s bottom changed significantly and occupied from 49.9% in March to 9.8% in September and 11.4 % in October. As a result, the obtained water occurrence map was divided into 4 groups, from areas never covered by the water to those with permanent water occurrence. Group 1 refers to the most extensive zone (41.5% of the Reservoir area), which includes the sandy eolian massif of Velikiy Kuchugury and high floodplains. Group 2 constitutes a zone (20.8%) of near-channel sandy and detrital accumulative surfaces, flat, silt-covered surfaces favorable for vegetation. Group 3 (29.6 %) represents a zone of small floodplain lakes and lowered sections of former floodplains, coastal wet areas where groundwater and surface water are discharged from streams and tributaries. Group 4 (8.1%) includes the main channel of the Dnipro, some of its straits, the Belozersky estuary, the cooling pond, and numerous lakes.

References 

Andreiev, A., & Artiushyn, L. (2024). Improvement of land cover classification accuracy by training sample clustering. RADIOELECTRONIC AND COMPUTER SYSTEMS, 66–72. https://doi.org/10.32620/reks.2024.2.06

Burshtynska, K., Kokhan, S., Pfeifer, N., Halochkin, M., & Zayats, I. (2023). Hydrological Modeling for Determining Flooded Land from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Images—Case Study at the Dniester River. Remote Sensing, 15(4), 1071. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15041071

Copernicus. Product specifications – Water and Wetness 2015 https://land.copernicus.eu/en/products/high-resolution-layer-water-and-wetness Publication date: 06.04.2018

Gao, B. (1996). NDWI—A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space. Remote Sensing of Environment, 58(3), 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0034-4257(96)00067-3

Huang, C., Chen, Y., Zhang, S., & Wu, J. (2018). Detecting, extracting, and monitoring surface water from space using optical sensors: a review. Reviews of Geophysics56(2), 333–360. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018rg000598

Kokhan, S. (2007). Classification of remotely sensed data. NATO science for peace and security series. C, Environmental security, 239–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6438-8_14

Pekel, J., Cottam, A., Gorelick, N., & Belward, A. S. (2016). High-resolution mapping of global surface water and its long-term changes. Nature, 540(7633), 418–422. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature20584

Popov, M. A., Stankevich, S. A., Kostyuchenko, Y. V., & Kozlova, A. A. (2019). Analysis of Local Climate Variations Using Correlation between Satellite Measurements of Methane Emission and Temperature Trends within Physiographic Regions of Ukraine. International Journal of Mathematical Engineering and Management Sciences, 4(2), 276–288. https://doi.org/10.33889/ijmems.2019.4.2-023

Rodrigues, J. A., Martins, A., Mendes, M., Farinha, J. T., Mateus, R. J. G., & Cardoso, A. J. M. (2022). Automatic risk assessment for an industrial asset using unsupervised and supervised learning. Energies, 15(24), 9387. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15249387

Stankevich, S., Kozlova, A., Zaitseva, E. & Levashenko, V. (2023). Multivariate risk assessment of land degradation by remotely sensed data. International Conference on Information and Digital Technologies (IDT), 45-50. https://doi.org/10.1109/IDT59031.2023.10194398

Trofymchuk, O., Sheviakina, N., & Tomchenko, O. (2023). DESTRUCTION OF THE KAKHOVKA RESERVOIR AS A RESULT OF HOSTILITIES: DYNAMICS OF CHANGE AND CONSEQUENCES FOR THE ENVIRONMENT. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM, 87-94. https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2023v/3.2/s12.11

Yang, X., Chen, Y., & Wang, J. (2020). Combined use of Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8 to monitor water surface area dynamics using Google Earth Engine. Remote Sensing Letters11(7), 687–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/2150704x.2020.1757780