Possibilities of SLAM scanning implementation in martial law conditions

Fixation, Monitoring & Assessment of War Consequences and Post-War Reconstruction (NEW)

Authors

First and Last Name Academic degree E-mail Affiliation
Vitalii Kovtun No Vitalii.kovtun [at] nung.edu.ua Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas
Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine
Oksana Gera Ph.D. oksana.hera [at] nung.edu.ua Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas
Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine
Liubov Dorosh Ph.D. liubov.dorosh [at] gmail.com Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas
Ivano-Frankivsk , Ukraine
Rostyslav Pylypiuk Ph.D. rostok1009 [at] gmail.com Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas
Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine

I and my co-authors (if any) authorize the use of the Paper in accordance with the Creative Commons CC BY license

First published on this website: 20.08.2024 - 09:22
Abstract 

The paper analyzes the challenges faced by specialists in the field of geodesy in times of martial law. The possibility of introducing mobile 3D scanning to record the destruction of buildings and infrastructure as a result of military aggression was considered. An example of performing SLAM scanning on a real object state after a missile attack is given. The advantages of mobile laser scanning compared to other geodesic methods of collecting spatial information, such as tacheometric and GNSS surveying, have been established.

References 
  1. Accuracy Evaluation and Comparison of Mobile Laser Scanning and Mobile Photogrammetry Data. / Kalvoda Petr, et al. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing. 2020. URL: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/609/1/012091/pdf (date of request: 10.07.2024) (in English).
  2. DBN A.2.1-1-2014. Search, design and territorial activity. search Engineering searches for construction. Draft, second edition [DBN A.2.1-1-2014. Vyshukuvannia, proektuvannia i terytorialna diialnist. Vyshukuvannia. Inzhenerni vyshukuvannia dlia budivnytstva]. K.: Ministry of Regional Construction of Ukraine, 2014. 126 с. (in Ukrainian).
  3. DBN V.1.3.-2:2010. A system for ensuring the accuracy of geometric parameters in construction. Geodetic works in construction [DBN V.1.3.-2:2010. Systema zabezpechennia tochnosti heometrychnykh parametriv v budivnytstvi. Heodezychni roboty v budivnytstvi]. K.: Ministry of Regional Development of Ukraine, 2010. 70 p. (in Ukrainian).
  4. Kang, T. W., Hong, C. H. A study on software architecture for effective BIM/GIS-based facility management data integration. Automation in Construction. 2015. №. 54. p. 25–38.  (in English).
  5. Kovtun, V., Lysko, B., Kutsenko, O., Pylypiuk, R. (2024, April). Research on the accuracy of determining the spatial position of objects using SLAM scanning method [Doslidzhennia tochnosti vyznachennia prostorovoho polozhennia obʼyektiv metodom slam skanuvannia]. International scientific and technical conference «Geoforum-2024» (Vol. 2024, No. 1, pp. 27-29). (in Ukrainian)
  6. Panfilova, E.E., Malkin, I.I. Risk management information system in the organizations of the construction industry as a tool for increasing business revenue. Relevant lines of scientific research: theory and practice. TSNS Interaktiv Plus. 2020. p. 132–137. (in English).
  7. Savchyn, I., Tretyak, K., Brusak, I., Lozynskyi, V., & Duma, M. (2023, October). Rapid Fixation and Digitization for Cultural Heritage Preservation in Conflict Zones. In International Conference of Young Professionals «GeoTerrace-2023» (Vol. 2023, No. 1, pp. 1-5). European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. (in English).
  8. Sigalov, K., Konig, M. Recognition of process patterns for BIM-based construction schedules. Advanced Engineering Informatics. 2017. №. 33. p. 456–472. (in English).
  9. Review of mobile mapping and surveying technologies.  / Puente I., González-Jorge H., Martínez-Sánchez J., Arias P. Measurement, 2013. 46.7. p. 2127-2145.