Influence of «cross-subvention» on economic efficiency thermal insulation of buildings is viewed. The optimum thickness of thermal insulation for each tariff group is calculated. Awarded the negative role of the modern tariff policy. It is shown that to improve the attractiveness of the energy efficiency measures required state participation. The proportion of state compensation must be up to the «crosssubvention».
[1] N. Polishchuk (2015, March 10) Taryfy na teplovu enerhiiu dlia potreb naselennia sered 125 mist Ukrainy (heohrafiia ta dynamika 2013-2015) [Tariffs for heat energy for households among 125 cities in Ukraine (geography and dynamics 2013-2015)]. [Online] Available: http://infolight.org.ua/content/ taryfy-na-teplovu-energiyu-dlya-potreb-naselennyasered-125-mist-ukrayiny-geografiya-ta-dynamika2013-2015 (URL).
[2] “Teplova izoliatsiya budivel” [“Thermal insulation of buildings”], DBN V.2.6-31, 2006, 65 pages.
[3] Directive 2010/31/EU of the European parliament and of the council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of building.
[4] V. L. Martynov, “Ekonomichno dotsilne uteplennia zovnishnikh ohorodzhuvalnykh konstruktsii enerhoekonomichnykh budivel pry zadanomu termini okupnosti” [“Economical feasibility insulation external cladding energy efficient building with task payback”], Visnyk Kremenchutskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Mykhaila Ostrohradskoho – Transactions of Kremenchuk Mykhailo Ostro-hradskyi National University, Vol.1(66), Part 1, pp.158-162, 2011.
[5] A. Malinowski et.al., “Komputerowe wspomaganie audytingu energetycznego miejskich systemów ciepłowniczych” [“Computer support of energy audit of city thermal networks”], In Proceedings IX International Science and Technology Seminar «Energodom 2008», Krakow, Poland, pp.321-329, 2008.