Review of an article submitted to the conference

Article’s title

Investigation the kinetics of the process of destruction organic contaminations wastewater production margarine

The article's title reflects the content and purpose of the article?

Yes

Was the aim of the work clearly defined and successfully accomplished?

Yes

Does the article embrace contemporary issues in the area?

Yes

Does the article contain new and not published results?

I do not know

Was the article clearly written and easily understood?

Easily understood

Conclusions illustrate the research results, recommendations and giving suggestions for future research

Yes

The references are full and grounded?

Yes

How adequate was the writing and used terminology?

Adequate

Remarks and suggestions to the authors of the article

Dear authors, make corrections, please:
correct the title of the article (for example, ‘’Template for the Camera Ready’’ - Preparative Synthesis of 1–fluorocyclopropyl Carboxylic Acid Derivatives)
Name Surname (Author 1)1, Name Surname (Author 2)2
(use Times New Roman, 12pt, centered, speaker’s name is underlined)
1. Department, University, COUNTRY, City, Street address, E-mail: author1yourdomain [dot] com
(use Times New Roman, 10pt, center)
2. Department, University, COUNTRY, City, Street address, E-mail: author2yourdomain [dot] com
(use Times New Roman, 10pt, center)
correct references according to the example:
[1] J. K. Author, “Title of chapter in the book,” in Title of His Published Book, xth ed. City of Publisher, Country if not USA: Abbrev. of Publisher, year, ch. x, sec. x, pp. xxx–xxx.
[2] J. K. Author, “Title of paper,” in Unabbreviated Name of Conf., City of Conf., Abbrev. State (if given), year, pp. xxx-xxx.
We are waiting for an updated version of the article.

I confirm that there is no conflict of interests regarding reviewed article.

I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.