Danube loess magnetostratigraphy: a perspective from Ukraine

Earth Surface Processes & Geodynamics

Authors

First and Last Name Academic degree E-mail Affiliation
Dmytro Hlavatskyi Ph.D. hlavatskyi [at] gmail.com Institute of Geophysics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Kyiv, Ukraine
Vladimir Bakhmutov Sc.D. bakhmutovvg [at] gmail.com Institute of Geophysics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Kyiv, Ukraine
Kyiv, Ukraine
Institute of Geophysics Polish Academy of Sciences
Kyiv, Ukraine
Yurii Veklych No veklych_um [at] ukr.net Separate subdivision "Ukrainian Geological Prospecting Institute" of the State Enterprise "Ukrainian Geological Company"
Kyiv, Ukraine
Victor Shpyra No shpyra [at] gmail.com Institute of Geophysics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Kyiv, Ukraine
Ievgen Poliachenko Ph.D. poliachenkoib [at] gmail.com Institute of Geophysics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Kyiv, Ukraine

I and my co-authors (if any) authorize the use of the Paper in accordance with the Creative Commons CC BY license

First published on this website: 28.08.2022 - 10:47
Abstract 

A first palaeomagnetic study has been carried out on a new section with a potential lower boundary interval for the Quaternary, Dolynske 3 (Lower Danube, southern Ukraine). Recently, the Matuyama–Brunhes boundary (at 780 ka) was detected in the adjacent section of Dolynske 2. The current study focuses on the hydromorphic clays and pedosediments of the Bogdanivka to Kryzhanivka units (S13–S8). Samples from the Upper Bogdanivka (S11) and Upper Berezan (L9L1) subunits show a clearly defined reversed polarity related to the Matuyama chron; some samples from other layers were uninformative due to hydromorphic features and were rejected from the interpretation. Given the unsuitability of hydromorphic palaeosols and loesses for magnetostratigraphic studies, the determination of the Gauss–Matuyama boundary requires additional, including methodological, research on other sections of Ukraine. The stratigraphic completeness of the composite Dolynske section, its geomorphological location within the Pliocene Danube terraces and convenient geographical setting allow offering it for study as a reference section for the loess/soil formation in the Lower Danube basin. Furthermore, tentative stratigraphic correlations of loess-palaeosol sequences in south-eastern Europe require revision and adaptation in view of new magnetic data from the more complete Ukrainian loess sequences.

References 

Bakhmutov V., Hlavatskyi D. [2022] On the reliability of a stratigraphic interpretation that overlooks geophysical techniques and results when determining the age of loess-soil deposits – comment on Łanczont et al. (2022) “A remarkable last glacial loess sedimentation at Roxolany in the Dniester Liman (Southern Ukraine)”. Quaternary Science Reviews, 107668.

Bakhmutov V., Hlavatskyi D., Stepanchuk V., Poliachenko, Ie. [2018] Rock magnetism and magnetostratigraphy of loess-palaesol sections – Lower Paleolithic sites of Podolian upland (Medzhybizh, Holovchintsi). 12th International Conference on Monitoring of Geological Processes and Ecological Condition of the Environment, Kyiv, Ukraine, 1–5.

Bakhmutov V.G., Kazanskii A.Yu., Matasova G.G., Glavatskii D.V. [2017] Rock Magnetism and Magnetostratigraphy of the Loess-Sol Series of Ukraine (Roksolany, Boyanychi, and Korshev Sections). Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth53 (6), 65–86.

Bokhorst M.P., Beets C.J., Marković S.B., Gerasimenko N.P., Matviishina Z.N., Frechen M. [2009] Pedo-Chemical Climate Proxies in Late Pleistocene Serbian–Ukranian Loess Sequences. Quaternary International, 198, 113–123.

Hlavatskyi D., Bakhmutov V. [2021] Early-Middle Pleistocene Magnetostratigraphic and Rock Magnetic Records of the Dolynske Section (Lower Danube, Ukraine) and Their Application to the Correlation of Loess-Palaeosol Sequences in Eastern and South-Eastern Europe. Quaternary, (4), 43.

Hlavatskyi D.V., Bakhmutov V.G. [2020] Magnetostratigraphy and magnetic susceptibility of the best developed Pleistocene loess-palaeosol sequences of Ukraine: implications for correlation and proposed chronostratigraphic models. Geological Quarterly64 (3), 723–753.

Jordanova D., Petersen N. [1999] Palaeoclimatic Record from a Loess-Soil Profile in Northeastern Bulgaria—II. Correlation with Global Climatic Events during the Pleistocene. Geophysical Journal International, 138, 533–540.

Lisiecki L.E., Raymo M.E. [2005] A Pliocene–Pleistocene stack of 57 globally distributed benthic δ18O records. Paleoceanography, 20, PA1003.

Makó L., Molnár D., Runa B., Bozsó G., Cseh P., Nagy B., Sümegi P. [2021] Selected Grain-Size and Geochemical Analyses of the Loess-Paleosol Sequence of Pécel (Northern Hungary): An Attempt to Determine Sediment Accumulation Conditions and the Source Area Location. Quaternary, 4, 17.

Marković S.B., Stevens T., Kukla G.J., Hambach U., Fitzsimmons K.E., Gibbard P., Buggle B., Zech M., Guo Z., Hao Q., et al. [2015] Danube Loess Stratigraphy–Towards a Pan-European Loess Stratigraphic Model. Earth-Science Reviews, 148, 228–258.

Matoshko A., Matoshko A., de Leeuw A. [2019] The Plio–Pleistocene Demise of the East Carpathian Foreland Fluvial System and Arrival of the Paleo-Danube to The Black Sea. Geologica Carpathica, 70, 91–112.

Namier N., Gao X., Hao Q., Marković S.B., Fu Y., Song Y., Zhang H., Wu X., Deng C., Gavrilov M. B., Guo Z. [2021] Mineral magnetic properties of loess-paleosol couplets of northern Serbia over the last 1.0 Ma. Quaternary Research, 103, 35–48.

Necula C., Dimofte D., Panaiotu C. [2015] Rock Magnetism of a Loess-Palaeosol Sequence from the Western Black Sea Shore (Romania). Geophysical Journal International, 1733–1748.

Rădan S.-C. [2012] Towards a Synopsis of Dating the Loess from the Romanian Plain and Dobrogea: Authors and Methods through Time. Geo-Eco-Marina 2012, 18, 153–172.

Song Y., Guo Z., Marković S., Hambach U., Deng C., Chang L., Wu J., Hao Q. [2018] Magnetic Stratigraphy of the Danube Loess: A Composite Titel-Stari Slankamen Loess Section over the Last One Million Years in Vojvodina, Serbia. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 155, 68–80.

Sümegi P., Gulyás S., Molnár D., Sümegi B.P., Almond P.C., Vandenberghe J., Zhou L., Pál-Molnár E., Törőcsik T., Hao Q. et al. [2018] New Chronology of the Best Developed Loess/Paleosol Sequence of Hungary Capturing the Past 1.1 Ma: Implications for Correlation and Proposed Pan-Eurasian Stratigraphic Schemes. Quaternary Science Reviews, 191, 144–166.

Sümegi P., Gulyás S., Molnár D., Sümegi B.P., Törőcsik T., Almond P.C., Smalley I., Zhou L., Galovic L., Pál-Molnár E., et al. [2019] Periodicities of Paleoclimate Variations in the First High-Resolution Non-Orbitally Tuned Grain Size Record of the Past 1 Ma from SW Hungary and Regional, Global Correlations. Aeolian Research, 40, 74–90.

Tecsa V., Gerasimenko N., Veres D., Hambach U., Lehmkuhl F., Schulte P., Timar-Gabor A. [2020] Revisiting the chronostratigraphy of Late Pleistocene loess-paleosol sequences in southwestern Ukraine: OSL dating of Kurortne section. Quaternary International, 542, 65–79.

Wacha L., Laag C., Grizelj A., Tsukamoto S., Zeeden C., Ivanišević D., Rolf C., Banak A., Frechen M. High-Resolution Palaeoenvironmental Reconstruction at Zmajevac (Croatia) over the Last Three Glacial/Interglacial Cycles. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 576, 110504.