Review of an article submitted to the conference

Approval status: Accept without acknowledging of remarks

Date Published: 03.06.2021 - 19:33

Article’s title

Polypyrazolylborate complexes of the lanthanides: structure, optics and materials science

The article's title reflects the content and purpose of the article?

Yes

Was the aim of the work clearly defined and successfully accomplished?

Yes

Does the article embrace contemporary issues in the area?

Yes

Does the article contain new and not published results?

Yes

Was the article clearly written and easily understood?

Easily understood

Conclusions illustrate the research results, recommendations and giving suggestions for future research

Partially

The references are full and grounded?

Partially

How adequate was the writing and used terminology?

Adequate

Remarks and suggestions to the authors of the article

The word "science" is missing in the title of the article (compared to the one written in the article list).
The reference information is not complete, the page and DOI numbers are missing.

I confirm that there is no conflict of interests regarding reviewed article.

I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have insignificant reservations, as outlined above.